The Hating Game Review
| Published | 2016-08-09 |
| Series | Standalone |
| Genre | Romance, Contemporary Fiction |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | William Morrow Paperbacks |
| ISBN-10 | 0062439596 |
| ISBN-13 | 9780062439598 |
πThe Hating Game β My Honest Review
Written and reviewed by Shadab Alam. The opinions and rating in this review are my own.
Summary:
Coworkers Lucy and Joshua compete for the same promotion while turning mutual irritation into increasingly obvious attraction. The book becomes most personal when Lucy's energetic first-person voice creates momentum, while Joshua's reserve lets small gestures carry romantic weight. Its wider questions involve competition, insecurity, workplace identity, attraction, image, vulnerability, and assumptions, but they remain connected to what the characters risk and lose.
β What I Liked
My favorite parts involved the office rivalry, elevator tension, combative banter, and gradual reinterpretation of Joshua's behavior. They worked especially well because Lucy's energetic first-person voice creates momentum, while Joshua's reserve lets small gestures carry romantic weight. In The Hating Game, the result felt specific rather than manufactured.
β What Could Be Better
My reservation is that the workplace behavior is often unprofessional, the size contrast repeats, and the power dynamics may not work for everyone. Another reader may accept it, but I felt The Hating Game lose some control there.
The people gave competition its real pressure through the office rivalry. Lucy's energetic first-person voice creates momentum, while Joshua's reserve lets small gestures carry romantic weight. The person on the page is allowed to be inconsistent about competition, which made the choices easier to trust. I was most attentive during the office rivalry, elevator tension, combative banter, and gradual reinterpretation of Joshua's behavior. The attention paid to the office rivalry gives the larger question of competition a human scale.
For me, the real argument concerns competition and insecurity. The plot matters because it forces competition and insecurity into practical choices, where a clean belief becomes harder to maintain.
I did lose confidence when the workplace behavior is often unprofessional, the size contrast repeats, and the power dynamics may not work for everyone. A little more patience would have made the material around competition easier to believe.
The pace is uneven, but the shifts usually follow a change in how the characters understand competition through the office rivalry.
One brief exchange about insecurity, tied to the office rivalry, did more for me than the longer explanations around it.
The book earns its place with me through the office rivalry. Its unresolved problem remains the workplace behavior is often unprofessional.
πShadab's Rating
πVibe Check
Read spoilers, debates, and detailed user reviews in our discussion room.
Discover Your Next Great Read
Handpicked recommendations from our collection of literary treasures
